Maryland Legislative WatchMaryland Legislative Watch

Keeping an eye on the General Assembly

Secondary menu

Skip to content
  • Home|
  • Votes - Current|
    • 2014 Delegates|
    • 2014 Senators|
  • Votes - Historical|
    • Votes - Delegates|
    • Votes - Senators|
  • Bond Bills|
  • Expenses|
  • How to use the site|
  • Contact|
  • Status and Index of Posts|
You are here: Home / 2014 MD SB 926/HB 847 set rules for drones

2014 MD SB 926/HB 847 set rules for drones

Published on 5 March, 2014 by Elizabeth

raskin

The 2014 session is over and this post is for information purposes, only.

SB 926 and HB 847, sponsored by Senator Raskin and Delegate Rosenberg, respectively, sets parameters for government drone use.  While this bill does not ban government drones, it does set restrictions on their use.  This bill, while not good, is better than what we have now.

Like other drone use bills, it says that drones may be used only in an, “emergency“, as defined in Maryland code:

“Emergency” means a sudden or unexpected happening or an unforeseen combination of circumstances that calls for immediate action to protect health, safety, welfare, or property from actual or threatened harm or from an unlawful act.

A few of the key provisions of this bill:

(D) (1) INFORMATION ABOUT A PERSON ACQUIRED THROUGH THE OPERATION OF A DRONE MAY BE DISCLOSED OR RECEIVED IF THE PERSON HAS GIVEN WRITTEN CONSENT TO THE DISCLOSURE.

(2) (I) A DRONE MAY BE OPERATED TO COLLECT INFORMATION FROM A NONPUBLIC AREA AND INFORMATION FROM THE OPERATION MAY BE DISCLOSED ONLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH A WARRANT ISSUED UNDER § 1–203 OF THIS SUBTITLE OR AS DESCRIBED IN SUBSECTION (H)  OF THIS SECTION.

A warrant may be issued if:

A. A REASONABLE SUSPICION OF CRIMINAL ACTIVITY; AND
B. A LIKELIHOOD THAT THE OPERATION OF THE DRONE WILL UNCOVER THE ACTIVITY.

2. A COURT MAY NOT ISSUE AN ORDER UNDER THIS SUBPARAGRAPH THAT IS IN EFFECT FOR A PERIOD LONGER THAN 48 HOURS.
3. EXTENSIONS OF AN ORDER UNDER THIS SUBPARAGRAPH MAY BE GRANTED FOR A PERIOD OF TIME THAT THE AUTHORIZING JUDGE DEEMS NECESSARY TO ACHIEVE THE PURPOSES FOR WHICH IT WAS GRANTED BUT NOT LONGER THAN 30 DAYS.

Other provisions include:

  • Only the target of the warrant should be subject to drone surveillance
  • Facial recognition is prohibited
  • Data collected on a home, individual, or area, other than the target, may not be disclosed for any purpose
  • Data violating the above must be deleted within 24 hours
  • Drones may not be equipped with weapons

Wide ranging exceptions, which would allow for surveillance without a warrant, include:

  • Immediate danger of death or serious physical injury to an individual
  • Conspiratorial activities that threaten the, “national security interest”
  • Conspiratorial activities characteristic of, “organized crime”

There are also reporting provisions - each June a report on drone usage is due to the General Assembly.

In the Senate - Hearing 3/06 at 1:00 p.m.

Print Friendly Version of this pagePrint Get a PDF version of this webpagePDF

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • More
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • StumbleUpon
  • Pocket
  • Reddit
  • Print

Google+

Elizabeth Myers (MD Legislative Watch) Elizabeth Myers (MD Legislative Watch)
Posted in Featured, Natural Rights, Property Rights, Regulations | Tagged 2014, Carr, Judicial Proceedings, Judiciary, Klausmeier, Maryland General Assembly, Maryland Legislature, Middleton, Raskin, Rosenberg, Shank, Smigiel, Waldstreicher

Post navigation

← 2014 HB 1011 is the Maryland Liberty Preservation Act of 2014 2014 MD HB 332 proposes to preserve consumer choice in, “smart meters” →

Search MDLegWatch

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Who are your elected representatives?

Go to MDElect.net to find out.

Follow us on Twitter

My Tweets

Like us on Facebook

More Social Media

Visit us on Tumblr

Visit us on Pinterest

Categories

  • Budget
  • Constitutional Amendment
  • Double Standard
  • Economic Freedom
  • Education
  • Elections
  • Featured
  • Fees
  • Fines and Penalties
  • Firearms
  • Mandate
  • Natural Rights
  • Property Rights
  • Regulations
  • Representatives
  • Taxes
  • Transparency
  • Uncategorized

RSS RSS Feed

  • 2014 SB 1092 proposes to lift prohibition on some raw milk sales
  • 2014 MD HB 332 proposes to preserve consumer choice in, “smart meters”
  • 2014 MD SB 926/HB 847 set rules for drones
  • 2014 HB 1011 is the Maryland Liberty Preservation Act of 2014

Pages

  • Bond Bills
  • Contact
  • Expenses
  • Home
  • How to use the site
  • Volunteer
  • Votes - Current
    • 2014 Delegates Regular Session
    • 2014 Senators Regular Session
  • Votes - History
    • Votes - Delegates
      • 2005 Delegates Regular Session
      • 2006 Delegates Regular Session
      • 2006 Delegates Special Session
      • 2007 Delegates Regular Session
      • 2007 Delegates Special Session
      • 2008 Delegates Regular Session
      • 2009 Delegates Regular Session
      • 2010 Delegates Regular Session
      • 2011 Delegates Regular Session
      • 2011 Delegates Special Session
      • 2012 Delegates Regular Session
      • 2012 Delegates Special Session I
      • 2012 Delegates Special Session II
      • 2013 Delegates
    • Votes - Senators
      • 2005 Senators Regular Session
      • 2006 Senators Regular Session
      • 2006 Senators Special Session
      • 2007 Senators Regular Session
      • 2007 Senators Special Session
      • 2008 Senators Regular Session
      • 2009 Senators Regular Session
      • 2010 Senators Regular Session
      • 2011 Senators Regular Session
      • 2011 Senators Special Session
      • 2012 Senate Regular Session
      • 2012 Senators Special Session I
      • 2012 Senators Special Session II
      • 2013 Senators

Copyright © 2014 Maryland Legislative Watch.

Powered by WordPress and Cakifo.

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.