Maryland Legislative WatchMaryland Legislative Watch

Keeping an eye on the General Assembly

Secondary menu

Skip to content
  • Home|
  • MDLW’s Database|
  • Votes – Current|
    • 2016 Delegates Regular Session|
    • 2016 Senators Regular Session|
  • Votes|
    • Votes – Delegates|
    • Votes – Senators|
  • Vote Reports|
  • Bond Bills|
  • How to use the site|
  • Expenses|
  • Contact|
You are here: Home / 2014 SB 21 seeks to require drug testing for “welfare” recipients

2014 SB 21 seeks to require drug testing for “welfare” recipients

Published on 6 January, 2014 by Elizabeth

colburn

This 2014 bill expired in 2014.  

SB 21, sponsored by Senator Colburn, proposes to require individuals applying for or receiving temporary cash assistance benefits (“welfare”) to be tested for controlled dangerous substances (“drugs”).

(V) 1. AT THE TIME OF APPLICATION FOR ASSISTANCE, SUBMITS TO SUBSTANCE ABUSE SCREENING AND TESTING, AS ADMINISTERED  BY THE DEPARTMENT

The bill includes placement for drug treatment should the recipient test positive (but doesn’t say who’s paying for the treatment):

(i)  TEST THE APPLICANT OR RECIPIENT FOR A CONTROLLED DANGEROUS SUBSTANCE USING A TEST SELECTED BY THE DEPARTMENT, and, if THE APPLICANT OR RECIPIENT TESTS POSITIVE, determine placement for treatment and related support services

(3) MAY NOT RECEIVE MORE THAN 6 MONTHS OF TEMPORARY CASH ASSISTANCE WHILE IN TREATMENT.

Drug testing welfare recipients has many problems.  First, it’s a violation of the Maryland Declaration of Rights as this amounts to a general warrant for all welfare recipients – therefore, it is unconstitutional.

Art. 26. That all warrants, without oath or affirmation, to search suspected places, or to seize any person or property, are grievous and oppressive; and all general warrants to search suspected places, or to apprehend suspected persons, without naming or describing the place, or the person in special, are illegal, and ought not to be granted.

Second, using Florida’s welfare recipient drug testing program as an example, the program yielded a 2% positive rate.  Florida’s taxpayers lost more money with drug testing than without:

The numbers, confirming previous estimates, show that taxpayers spent $118,140 to reimburse people for drug test costs, at an average of $35 per screening.

The state’s net loss? $45,780.

Drug testing welfare recipients benefits one segment – drug testing companies.  Drug testing in Maryland costs upward of $45 per test.  The scheme of drug testing welfare recipients to the tune of $45+ per test, with a 2.6% positive rate (as in FL) results in a different type of welfare – corporate welfare for drug testing companies.

Finally, Florida’s law was found unconstitutional by a judge (again).  The legal costs to the taxpayers of Florida are not counted in the loss, above.

 

Print Friendly Version of this pagePrint Get a PDF version of this webpagePDF

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • More
  • LinkedIn
  • Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • Reddit
  • Print
Posted in Archive, Budget, Natural Rights | Tagged 2014, Colburn, corporate welfare, corporatism, Declaration of Rights, drug testing, Maryland General Assembly, Maryland Legislature, SB 21, welfare

Post navigation

← HB 15 proposes $1M to schools for bullet proof glass and metal detectors 2014 MD SB 28/HB 333 propose to reduce burden of proof for protective orders – unfavorable in House! →

Search MDLegWatch

Subscribe to MD Legislative Watch via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Who are your elected representatives?

Go to MDElect.net to find out.

Follow us on Twitter

My Tweets

Like us on Facebook

Like us on Facebook

More Social Media

Visit us on Tumblr

Visit us on Pinterest

Categories

  • Archive
  • Budget
  • Constitutional Amendment
  • Double Standard
  • Economic Freedom
  • Education
  • Elections
  • Featured
  • Fees
  • Fines and Penalties
  • Firearms
  • Mandate
  • Natural Rights
  • Property Rights
  • Regulations
  • Representatives
  • Taxes
  • Transparency
  • Uncategorized

RSS RSS Feed

  • Closing up shop
  • 2017 MD HB 1285 Seeks to Make Passenger without Seatbelt a Primary Offense
  • 2017 MD SB 928/HB 1185 Propose State Control of Cannabis
  • 2017 MD HB 600, SB 175 Propose to Regulate Private Property

Pages

  • Bond Bills
  • Contact
  • Expenses
  • Home
  • How to use the site
  • MDLW’s Database
  • Vote Reports
  • Voting Records
    • Votes – Delegates
      • 2005 Delegates Regular Session
      • 2006 Delegates Regular Session
      • 2006 Delegates Special Session
      • 2007 Delegates Regular Session
      • 2007 Delegates Special Session
      • 2008 Delegates Regular Session
      • 2009 Delegates Regular Session
      • 2010 Delegates Regular Session
      • 2011 Delegates Regular Session
      • 2011 Delegates Special Session
      • 2012 Delegates Regular Session
      • 2012 Delegates Special Session I
      • 2012 Delegates Special Session II
      • 2013 Delegates
      • 2014 Delegates Regular Session
      • 2015 Delegates Regular Session
      • 2016 Delegates Regular Session
    • Votes – Senators
      • 2005 Senators Regular Session
      • 2006 Senators Regular Session
      • 2006 Senators Special Session
      • 2007 Senators Regular Session
      • 2007 Senators Special Session
      • 2008 Senators Regular Session
      • 2009 Senators Regular Session
      • 2010 Senators Regular Session
      • 2011 Senators Regular Session
      • 2011 Senators Special Session
      • 2012 Senate Regular Session
      • 2012 Senators Special Session I
      • 2012 Senators Special Session II
      • 2013 Senators
      • 2014 Senators Regular Session
      • 2015 Senators Regular Session
      • 2016 Senators Regular Session

Copyright © 2018 Maryland Legislative Watch.

Powered by WordPress and Cakifo.

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.