Maryland Legislative WatchMaryland Legislative Watch

Keeping an eye on the General Assembly

Secondary menu

Skip to content
  • Home|
  • MDLW’s Database|
  • Votes - Current|
    • 2016 Delegates Regular Session|
    • 2016 Senators Regular Session|
    • Best Non Gamstop Casinos UK
    • Not On Gamstop Casino
    • Non Gamstop Casino
  • Votes|
    • Votes - Delegates|
    • Votes - Senators|
  • Vote Reports|
  • Bond Bills|
  • How to use the site|
  • Expenses|
  • Contact|
You are here: Home / 2017 MD SB 928/HB 1185 Propose State Control of Cannabis

2017 MD SB 928/HB 1185 Propose State Control of Cannabis

Published on 10 February, 2017 by Elizabeth

madaleno2017 SB 928 and HB 1185 sponsored by Senator Madaleno and Delegate Anderson, respectively, propose cannabis sales and production, heavily regulated by the State.  In addition to this, “legalization” bill, there is companion legislation for other cannabis taxation and regulation schemes.

This bill is very long so following are some highlights.  This bill proposes:

  • Add a civil punishment ($100) for vaporization of cannabis in a public place
  • Removes cannabis from offenses where a citizen’s property may be seized/taken by the State
  • Removes the, “use or possession of less than 10 grams of marijuana” language and replaces with, “smoking or vaporizing cannabis in a public place”
  • Establishes that a, “cannabis cultivation facility” is regulated by the State, with the Comptroller to write these regulations
  • Establishes that a, “Cannabis Product Manufacturer” and a “Craft Cannabis Cultivator” is regulated by the State with the Comptroller to write these regulations
  • Establishes that a, “personal use” amount of cannabis is, “1 OUNCE OR LESS OF CANNABIS IN DRIED PLANT FORM; 5 GRAMS OR LESS OF HASHISH OIL, GEL, OR SOLID EXTRACTS; 12 SERVINGS OF CANNABIS COMBINED WITH FOOD OR BEVERAGE PRODUCTS; 72 OUNCES OF CANNABIS IN A CREAM, GEL, OR LIQUID; OR A COMBINATION OF THE ABOVE” (abridged)
  • Anyone purchasing cannabis products must be 21 or older
  • Violating the regulations for cannabis cultivation may result in a misdemeanor conviction, jail time, and/or a fine
  • Testing positive for the active ingredient in cannabis would no longer be a termination offense for state and local government employees or potential employees (subject to federal regulations)
  • CULTIVATING SIX OR FEWER CANNABIS PLANTS, NO MORE THAN
    THREE OF WHICH MAY BE MATURE, FLOWERING PLANTS, AND POSSESSING THE CANNABIS PRODUCED BY THE PLANTS ON THE PREMISES WHERE
    THE PLANTS WERE GROWN would no longer be a crime
  • Some records for those convicted of cannabis offenses would be expunged
  • Potential retailers would apply to the State, with a non-refundable fee not to exceed $5,000 and retailers would be subject to these and not yet written regulations.  Retail licenses would cost $10,000.
  • Cannabis cultivator applications fees would not exceed $5,000 and license fees would be $10,000

And:

THE COMPTROLLER SHALL ISSUE REGULATIONS FOR APPLICATIONS FOR  CANNABIS PRODUCT MANUFACTURER REGISTRATION THAT INCLUDE:

(1) ESTABLISHING THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF  TETRAHYDROCANNABINOL (THC) THAT MAY BE ALLOWED IN A SINGLE SERVING OF  A CANNABIS–INFUSED EDIBLE PRODUCT;

(2) LIMITING AN INDIVIDUAL PACKAGE OF A CANNABIS–INFUSED  EDIBLE PRODUCT TO A SINGLE SERVING;

(3) MANDATING OPAQUE AND CHILD–RESISTANT PACKAGING FOR A  CANNABIS–INFUSED EDIBLE PRODUCT;

(4) REQUIRING THE DISSEMINATION OF EDUCATIONAL MATERIALS  TO CONSUMERS WHO PURCHASE CANNABIS–INFUSED EDIBLE PRODUCTS,  INCLUDING INFORMATION REGARDING THE LENGTH OF TIME IT TAKES THE  PRODUCT TO TAKE EFFECT; AND

(5) REQUIRING THAT A RETAIL CANNABIS–INFUSED EDIBLE  PRODUCT BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIABLE, WITH A STANDARD SYMBOL INDICATING THAT  THE PRODUCT CONTAINS CANNABIS.

This bill is 53 pages and includes many regulations.  It also leaves it to the Comptroller to develop many more regulations.  Given that the minimum purchase age is twenty one, the companion taxation bills and to be determined regulations for sellers, the ramifications of this bill are unknown.

These cross-filed bills will be heard in committee in early March.

Send email to the Email Edit Icon 7575House Judiciary Committee

(Click the send email icon now to pre-populate all the committee members’ email addresses in your default email client.)

Send email to the Email Edit Icon 7575Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee

(Click the send email icon now to pre-populate all the committee members’ email addresses in your default email client.)

Print Friendly Version of this pagePrint Get a PDF version of this webpagePDF

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • More
  • LinkedIn
  • Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • Reddit
  • Print
Posted in Economic Freedom, Natural Rights, Regulations | Tagged A. Miller, Anderson, B. Barnes, Barve, Branch, Cannabis, Cannabis Legalization, Carr, Conaway, Cullison, Feldman, Fennell, Fraser–Hidalgo, Glenn, Gutierrez, Hixson, Judicial Proceedings, Judiciary, Kelly, Korman, Lewis, Lierman, Luedtke, M. Washington, Madaleno, Manno, Marijuana, Marijuana Legalization, McIntosh, Moon, Morales, Oaks, Platt, Retail Cannabis, Robinson, Rosenberg, Sanchez, Smith, Turner, Waldstreicher, Wilkins

Post navigation

← 2017 MD HB 600, SB 175 Propose to Regulate Private Property 2017 MD HB 1285 Seeks to Make Passenger without Seatbelt a Primary Offense →

Search MDLegWatch

Subscribe to MD Legislative Watch via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Who are your elected representatives?

Go to MDElect.net to find out.

Follow us on Twitter

My Tweets

Like us on Facebook

Like us on Facebook

More Social Media

Visit us on Tumblr

Visit us on Pinterest

Categories

  • Archive
  • Budget
  • Constitutional Amendment
  • Double Standard
  • Economic Freedom
  • Education
  • Elections
  • Featured
  • Fees
  • Fines and Penalties
  • Firearms
  • Mandate
  • Natural Rights
  • Property Rights
  • Regulations
  • Representatives
  • Taxes
  • Transparency
  • Uncategorized

RSS RSS Feed

  • Closing up shop
  • 2017 MD HB 1285 Seeks to Make Passenger without Seatbelt a Primary Offense
  • 2017 MD SB 928/HB 1185 Propose State Control of Cannabis
  • 2017 MD HB 600, SB 175 Propose to Regulate Private Property

Pages

  • Bond Bills
  • Contact
  • Expenses
  • Home
  • How to use the site
  • MDLW’s Database
  • Vote Reports
  • Voting Records
    • Votes - Delegates
      • 2005 Delegates Regular Session
      • 2006 Delegates Regular Session
      • 2006 Delegates Special Session
      • 2007 Delegates Regular Session
      • 2007 Delegates Special Session
      • 2008 Delegates Regular Session
      • 2009 Delegates Regular Session
      • 2010 Delegates Regular Session
      • 2011 Delegates Regular Session
      • 2011 Delegates Special Session
      • 2012 Delegates Regular Session
      • 2012 Delegates Special Session I
      • 2012 Delegates Special Session II
      • 2013 Delegates
      • 2014 Delegates Regular Session
      • 2015 Delegates Regular Session
      • 2016 Delegates Regular Session
    • Votes - Senators
      • 2005 Senators Regular Session
      • 2006 Senators Regular Session
      • 2006 Senators Special Session
      • 2007 Senators Regular Session
      • 2007 Senators Special Session
      • 2008 Senators Regular Session
      • 2009 Senators Regular Session
      • 2010 Senators Regular Session
      • 2011 Senators Regular Session
      • 2011 Senators Special Session
      • 2012 Senate Regular Session
      • 2012 Senators Special Session I
      • 2012 Senators Special Session II
      • 2013 Senators
      • 2014 Senators Regular Session
      • 2015 Senators Regular Session
      • 2016 Senators Regular Session

Copyright © 2018 Maryland Legislative Watch.

Powered by WordPress and Cakifo.

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.