Maryland Legislative WatchMaryland Legislative Watch

Keeping an eye on the General Assembly

Secondary menu

Skip to content
  • Home|
  • MDLW’s Database|
  • Votes - Current|
    • 2016 Delegates Regular Session|
    • 2016 Senators Regular Session|
    • Best Non Gamstop Casinos UK
    • Not On Gamstop Casino
    • Non Gamstop Casino
  • Votes|
    • Votes - Delegates|
    • Votes - Senators|
  • Vote Reports|
  • Bond Bills|
  • How to use the site|
  • Expenses|
  • Contact|
You are here: Home / 2017 MD HB 600, SB 175 Propose to Regulate Private Property

2017 MD HB 600, SB 175 Propose to Regulate Private Property

Published on 1 February, 2017 by Elizabeth

Kramer2017 MD HB 600/SB 175, proposed by Delegate Kramer and Senator Manno, respectively, propose restrictions on private property where medical oxygen is in use.

Among the proposed nanny state provisions:

(A) AN INDIVIDUAL MAY NOT LIGHT OR SMOKE A CIGARETTE, CIGAR, PIPE, OR ANY OTHER MATTER OR SUBSTANCE THAT CONTAINS TOBACCO:

(1) IN A ROOM OF A RESIDENTIAL DWELLING IN WHICH MEDICAL OXYGEN IS BEING USED; OR

(2) WITHIN 20 FEET OF A ROOM OF A RESIDENTIAL DWELLING IN WHICH MEDICAL OXYGEN IS BEING USED.

And:

(2) AN INDIVIDUAL WHO USES OR WILL BEGIN TO USE MEDICAL OXYGEN SHALL NOTIFY THE OWNER OF THE RESIDENTIAL DWELLING, THE OWNER’S REPRESENTATIVE OR AGENT, OR THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION OR OTHER SIMILAR ENTITY THAT THE INDIVIDUAL USES OR WILL BEGIN TO USE MEDICAL OXYGEN.

(3) THE INDIVIDUAL SHALL MAKE THE NOTIFICATION REQUIRED UNDER PARAGRAPH (2) OF THIS SUBSECTION:

(I) AT LEAST 5 DAYS BEFORE BEGINNING TO RESIDE IN THE RESIDENTIAL DWELLING; OR

(II) IF THE INDIVIDUAL RESIDES IN THE RESIDENTIAL DWELLING AT THE TIME THE INDIVIDUAL WILL BEGIN TO USE MEDICAL OXYGEN, AT LEAST 5 DAYS BEFORE THE INDIVIDUAL BEGINS TO USE MEDICAL OXYGEN.

Owners and/or HOAs would be responsible to post, “oxygen in use” signs.

Of course, there is a monetary penalty, payable to the State, for infractions:

(1) FOR A FIRST VIOLATION, SHALL BE ISSUED A WRITTEN REPRIMAND BY THE SECRETARY OR THE SECRETARY’S DESIGNEE;

(2) FOR A SECOND VIOLATION, IS SUBJECT TO A CIVIL PENALTY OF $100; AND

(3) FOR EACH SUBSEQUENT VIOLATION, IS SUBJECT TO A CIVIL PENALTY NOT LESS THAN $250.

Send email to the Email Edit Icon 7575House Economic Matters Committee

(Click the send email icon now to pre-populate all the committee members’ email addresses in your default email client.)

 

Send email to the Email Edit Icon 7575Senate Finance Committee

(Click the send email icon now to pre-populate all the committee members’ email addresses in your default email client.)

Print Friendly Version of this pagePrint Get a PDF version of this webpagePDF

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • More
  • LinkedIn
  • Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • Reddit
  • Print
Posted in Featured, Fines and Penalties, Natural Rights | Tagged Chang, Feldman, Fines, Kramer, Manno, Morales, Nanny State, Penalties, Smith

Post navigation

← 2017 HB 255 Proposes to Impose Uniformity in MD for Evidence in Sexual Assault Cases 2017 MD SB 928/HB 1185 Propose State Control of Cannabis →

Search MDLegWatch

Subscribe to MD Legislative Watch via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Who are your elected representatives?

Go to MDElect.net to find out.

Follow us on Twitter

My Tweets

Like us on Facebook

Like us on Facebook

More Social Media

Visit us on Tumblr

Visit us on Pinterest

Categories

  • Archive
  • Budget
  • Constitutional Amendment
  • Double Standard
  • Economic Freedom
  • Education
  • Elections
  • Featured
  • Fees
  • Fines and Penalties
  • Firearms
  • Mandate
  • Natural Rights
  • Property Rights
  • Regulations
  • Representatives
  • Taxes
  • Transparency
  • Uncategorized

RSS RSS Feed

  • Closing up shop
  • 2017 MD HB 1285 Seeks to Make Passenger without Seatbelt a Primary Offense
  • 2017 MD SB 928/HB 1185 Propose State Control of Cannabis
  • 2017 MD HB 600, SB 175 Propose to Regulate Private Property

Pages

  • Bond Bills
  • Contact
  • Expenses
  • Home
  • How to use the site
  • MDLW’s Database
  • Vote Reports
  • Voting Records
    • Votes - Delegates
      • 2005 Delegates Regular Session
      • 2006 Delegates Regular Session
      • 2006 Delegates Special Session
      • 2007 Delegates Regular Session
      • 2007 Delegates Special Session
      • 2008 Delegates Regular Session
      • 2009 Delegates Regular Session
      • 2010 Delegates Regular Session
      • 2011 Delegates Regular Session
      • 2011 Delegates Special Session
      • 2012 Delegates Regular Session
      • 2012 Delegates Special Session I
      • 2012 Delegates Special Session II
      • 2013 Delegates
      • 2014 Delegates Regular Session
      • 2015 Delegates Regular Session
      • 2016 Delegates Regular Session
    • Votes - Senators
      • 2005 Senators Regular Session
      • 2006 Senators Regular Session
      • 2006 Senators Special Session
      • 2007 Senators Regular Session
      • 2007 Senators Special Session
      • 2008 Senators Regular Session
      • 2009 Senators Regular Session
      • 2010 Senators Regular Session
      • 2011 Senators Regular Session
      • 2011 Senators Special Session
      • 2012 Senate Regular Session
      • 2012 Senators Special Session I
      • 2012 Senators Special Session II
      • 2013 Senators
      • 2014 Senators Regular Session
      • 2015 Senators Regular Session
      • 2016 Senators Regular Session

Copyright © 2018 Maryland Legislative Watch.

Powered by WordPress and Cakifo.

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.