Maryland Legislative WatchMaryland Legislative Watch

Keeping an eye on the General Assembly

Secondary menu

Skip to content
  • Home|
  • Votes - Current|
    • 2016 Delegates Regular Session|
    • 2016 Senators Regular Session|
    • Migliori Siti Casino Online
    • Casinos Not On Gamstop
    • Casino Not On Gamstop
    • Best Non Gamstop Casinos UK
    • Not On Gamstop Casino
    • Non Gamstop Casino
  • Votes|
    • Votes - Delegates|
    • Votes - Senators|
  • Vote Reports|
  • Bond Bills|
  • How to use the site|
  • Expenses|
  • Contact|
You are here: Home / 2014 SB 209 proposes to hold alcohol sellers liable for damage caused by customers - unfavorable!

2014 SB 209 proposes to hold alcohol sellers liable for damage caused by customers - unfavorable!

Published on 20 January, 2014 by Elizabeth

kelleySB 209, sponsored by Senator Kelley, proposes to impose liability on a seller of alcohol when an intoxicated person causes damages.

WHEREAS, Maryland is one of only eight states where an alcoholic beverages licensee has no liability for a plaintiff’s damages when caused by the licensee’s serving of alcohol to a “visibly intoxicated” patron; and
WHEREAS, The Maryland Court of Appeals has declined to impose liability on an alcoholic beverages licensee for damages caused by an intoxicated patron; and
WHEREAS, The Maryland Court of Appeals has opined that the determination of whether to impose liability on an alcoholic beverages licensee for damages caused by an intoxicated patron involves significant public policy considerations and is best left to the General Assembly….

This bill would add Subtitle 19 to Article 3 of the Maryland code.  Proposed additions to the code:

A PERSON MAY BRING AN ACTION UNDER THIS SUBTITLE AGAINST A LICENSEE OR A  LICENSEE’S EMPLOYEE WHO SOLD OR FURNISHED ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES TO AN INDIVIDUAL IF:

(1) THE LICENSEE OR THE LICENSEE’S EMPLOYEE KNEW OR REASONABLY SHOULD HAVE KNOWN THAT THE INDIVIDUAL TO WHOM THE ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES WERE SOLD OR FURNISHED WAS VISIBLY UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES;
(2) THE LICENSEE OR THE LICENSEE’S EMPLOYEE COULD HAVE REASONABLY FORESEEN THAT THE INDIVIDUAL MIGHT DRIVE OR ATTEMPT TO DRIVE A MOTOR VEHICLE AFTER CONSUMING THE ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES;
(3) AFTER CONSUMING THE ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, THE INDIVIDUAL NEGLIGENTLY DROVE OR ATTEMPTED TO DRIVE A MOTOR VEHICLE; AND
(4) THE INDIVIDUAL’S NEGLIGENCE IN DRIVING OR ATTEMPTING TO DRIVE THE MOTOR VEHICLE WAS A PROXIMATE CAUSE OF THE DAMAGES CLAIMED IN THE ACTION.

This bill includes the language, “should have known.”  By that standard, it is reasonable to assume that anyone served alcohol could potentially drive - they’re all over 21 and most adults drive.  This puts the onus, on the owner/staff of the establishment, to confirm every customer’s driving status.

These laws have problems:  not all drunk people appear drunk; not all accidents involving those drinking alcohol are due to the alcohol; not all persons with alcohol in their systems are drunk.  Individuals are responsible for their actions and if one chooses to drink, operate a motor vehicle, and get into an accident, the individuals causing damage are liable for their own actions and choices.

Hearing 2/06 at 1:00 p.m.

Update: Unfavorable Report by Judicial Proceedings

Print Friendly Version of this pagePrint Get a PDF version of this webpagePDF

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • More
  • LinkedIn
  • Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • Reddit
  • Print
Posted in Archive, Featured, Property Rights, Regulations | Tagged 2014, Alcohol, Bars, Forehand, Judicial Proceedings, Kelley, Liability, Maryland General Assembly, Maryland Legislature, Montgomery, Robey, Taverns

Post navigation

← 2014 SB 246 proposes new police force for community college 2014 SB 236/HB 230 propose 18% raises for Comptroller, Treasurer, Att. General and Sec. of State →

Search MDLegWatch

Subscribe to MD Legislative Watch via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Who are your elected representatives?

Go to MDElect.net to find out.

Follow us on Twitter

My Tweets

Like us on Facebook

Like us on Facebook

More Social Media

Visit us on Tumblr

Visit us on Pinterest

Categories

  • Archive
  • Bonds
  • Budget
  • Constitutional Amendment
  • Double Standard
  • Economic Freedom
  • Education
  • Elections
  • Featured
  • Fees
  • Fines and Penalties
  • Firearms
  • Mandate
  • Natural Rights
  • Property Rights
  • Regulations
  • Representatives
  • Taxes
  • Tolls
  • Transparency
  • Uncategorized

RSS RSS Feed

  • 2016 MD HB 1178/SB 868 propose mandatory HPV vaccine for 9th graders
  • 2016 MD HB 740 Proposes Mandatory Employee Paid State Family/Medical Leave Insurance Fund
  • 2016 SB 435 Proposes to Eliminate Jukebox License Requirement
  • 2016 SB 500 Proposes a New FSK Bridge Authority

Pages

  • Bond Bills
  • Contact
  • Expenses
  • Home
  • How to use the site
  • Vote Reports
  • Votes - Current
    • 2016 Delegates Regular Session
    • 2016 Senators Regular Session
  • Voting Records
    • Votes - Delegates
      • 2005 Delegates Regular Session
      • 2006 Delegates Regular Session
      • 2006 Delegates Special Session
      • 2007 Delegates Regular Session
      • 2007 Delegates Special Session
      • 2008 Delegates Regular Session
      • 2009 Delegates Regular Session
      • 2010 Delegates Regular Session
      • 2011 Delegates Regular Session
      • 2011 Delegates Special Session
      • 2012 Delegates Regular Session
      • 2012 Delegates Special Session I
      • 2012 Delegates Special Session II
      • 2013 Delegates
      • 2014 Delegates Regular Session
      • 2015 Delegates Regular Session
    • Votes - Senators
      • 2005 Senators Regular Session
      • 2006 Senators Regular Session
      • 2006 Senators Special Session
      • 2007 Senators Regular Session
      • 2007 Senators Special Session
      • 2008 Senators Regular Session
      • 2009 Senators Regular Session
      • 2010 Senators Regular Session
      • 2011 Senators Regular Session
      • 2011 Senators Special Session
      • 2012 Senate Regular Session
      • 2012 Senators Special Session I
      • 2012 Senators Special Session II
      • 2013 Senators
      • 2014 Senators Regular Session
      • 2015 Senators Regular Session

Copyright © 2016 Maryland Legislative Watch.

Powered by WordPress and Cakifo.

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.